The Synergistic 10-Step Cumulative Communication Framework
- J Jayanthi Chandran

- Sep 29
- 7 min read
Abstract
This study introduces a synergistic 10-step communication framework that integrates character-based communication actions with comprehensive motivation and organizational models. By aligning psychological safety, operational efficiency, decision-making, influence, and strategic positioning with models such as CMFM, DRRM, HEGM, SOMM, CEMAM, NAGM, PIPM, SCCM, and DVMM, the framework enables improved engagement, collaboration, and measurable organizational value. Applications include workshops, digital collaboration, and strategic reporting.
1. Introduction
Effective organizational communication must address psychological, operational, and strategic layers simultaneously. Traditional models focus on one or two aspects, missing the holistic integration necessary for contemporary organizational environments. This paper proposes a 10-step synergistic framework that:
Lays a strong foundation of awareness, needs identification, and psychological safety.
Supports operational effectiveness through collaboration, task management, and workflow tracking.
Integrates decision-making and conflict resolution for transparent, fair, and value-aligned outcomes.
Enhances influence, presentation, and impact demonstration.
Ensures participative management, strategic visibility, and effective MIS usage.
2. Literature Review
Topic | Key Findings | Research Gap |
Communication Models | Linear, Interactive, Transactional (Shannon & Weaver, 1949; Barnlund, 1970) | Limited integration of operational, decision, and strategic communication with motivational models |
Psychological Safety | Edmondson (1999) – trust enhances team performance | Existing frameworks rarely link safety to structured operational workflows |
Decision-Making | Functional Group Decision-Making Theory | Often lacks connection to motivational alignment and value exchange |
Digital Collaboration | Social Penetration Theory, Coordinated Management of Meaning | Few studies integrate digital collaboration with motivation and organizational outcomes |
MIS & Strategic Communication | Management Information Systems Theory | Gap in combining participative management, MIS reporting, and motivational insights |
Research Gap: Most frameworks address communication, decision-making, or motivation separately. A holistic, model-aligned, and actionable framework is needed.
3. Research Objectives
Develop a synergistic 10-step communication framework integrating character labels with your motivational and organizational models.
Map each step to practical skills, digital tools, and expected outcomes.
Provide a framework applicable to both academic research and real-world organizational contexts.
4. Methodology
Approach: Conceptual-Experiential Analysis (CEA) – combining theoretical insights with practical experience.
Sources: Literature review, professional experience, model design (CMFM, DRRM, HEGM, SOMM, CEMAM, NAGM, PIPM, SCCM, DVMM).
Framework Design: Character-based labeling, clustered groups, model alignment, and modern tool integration.

5. The 10-Step Synergistic Framework
Step | Character / Label | Focus Area | Key Skills / Traits | Relevant Models | Practical Tools / Methods | Expected Outcome |
1 | Foundation | Identify Needs | Active listening, empathy, questioning | CMFM, NAGM, SCCM | 1-to-1 interviews, surveys, stakeholder mapping | Baseline understanding, psychological & motivational alignment |
2 | Extension | Address Psychological Needs | Emotional intelligence, rapport-building | HEGM, DRRM, SCCM | Pulse surveys, feedback channels | Engagement, trust, psychological safety |
3 | Coding | Build Relatedness Skills | Networking, collaboration, digital teamwork | SOMM, CEMAM, SCCM | Virtual team-building, peer mentoring, Miro/Yammer | Collaborative culture, team cohesion |
4 | Document | Guide Task Completion | Goal-setting, progress tracking | SOMM, CEMAM, SCCM | Trello, Jira, Asana dashboards | Operational efficiency, task clarity |
5 | Grammarly | Resolve Conflict | Mediation, negotiation, reframing | CEMAM, DRRM, DVMM | Zoom mediation, structured templates | Reduced tension, conflict resolution |
6 | Decisive | Facilitate Decision Making | Critical thinking, consensus-building | CEMAM, CMFM, NAGM, DVMM | Digital decision matrices, collaborative docs, polls | Transparent, value-aligned decisions |
7 | Influence | Present & Persuade | Public speaking, storytelling, visual communication | CMFM, HEGM, SCCM | Canva/Prezi slides, interactive Q&A | Engaged, motivated audience |
8 | Value | Communicate Earnings / Value | Data literacy, ROI demonstration | CMFM, PIPM, DVMM | Power BI/Tableau, infographic newsletters | Demonstrated ROI and impact |
9 | Manage | Integrate Participative Management | Leadership, delegation, empowerment | SOMM, HEGM, DRRM, SCCM | Co-creation workshops, collaborative platforms | Shared ownership, innovation, team growth |
10 | Traditional Touch | Leverage MIS & Present Paper | Strategic positioning, formal communication | CEMAM, PIPM, DVMM | MIS dashboards, executive summaries, conference presentations | Professional visibility, informed strategic decisions |
6. Grouped Clusters with Models
Group | Steps & Characters | Focus / Essence | Relevant Models |
Foundation | 1-2 (Foundation, Extension) | Awareness, trust, psychological safety | CMFM, NAGM, HEGM, DRRM, SCCM |
Execution | 3-4 (Coding, Document) | Collaboration, workflow management | SOMM, CEMAM, SCCM |
Decision & Resolution | 5-6 (Grammarly, Decisive) | Conflict management, structured decisions | CEMAM, DRRM, CMFM, NAGM, DVMM |
Influence & Value | 7-8 (Influence, Value) | Persuasion, ROI demonstration | CMFM, HEGM, SCCM, PIPM, DVMM |
Management & Strategic Positioning | 9-10 (Manage, Traditional Touch) | Leadership, participative management, MIS reporting | SOMM, HEGM, DRRM, SCCM, CEMAM, PIPM, DVMM |
7. Alignment with Communication Theories
Step | Communication Model | Craig’s Tradition | Context / Application | Illustrative Tools |
1 | Linear + Interactive | Socio-psychological | Interviews, surveys | Lasswell, Uncertainty Reduction, Google Forms |
2 | Interactive | Phenomenological + Socio-psychological | Feedback channels | Dialogue Theory (Buber), Social Exchange, Officevibe, Slack |
3 | Transactional | Socio-cultural | Team collaboration | Social Penetration Theory, CMM, Miro/Yammer |
4 | Interactive | Cybernetic | Task coordination | Systems Theory, Input-Throughput-Output, Trello/Jira |
5 | Transactional | Critical + Socio-psychological | Conflict mediation | Thomas-Kilmann, Face Negotiation, structured templates |
6 | Interactive/Transactional | Rhetorical + Cybernetic | Meetings, stakeholder decisions | Functional Decision-Making, Mentimeter polls, collaborative docs |
7 | Linear + Rhetorical | Rhetorical + Semiotic | Presentations, webinars | Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Narrative Paradigm, Canva/Prezi |
8 | Linear + Rhetorical + Cybernetic | Rhetorical + Critical | Stakeholder updates | Agenda-Setting, Framing, Power BI/Tableau |
9 | Interactive/Participative | Socio-political + Cybernetic | Workshops, co-creation | Participative Leadership Theory, Miro/Slack |
10 | Linear + Rhetorical + Analytical | Rhetorical + Cybernetic + Strategic | MIS dashboards, conference papers | MIS Theory, executive summaries, structured abstracts |
8. Integrating SSR into Your 10-Step Framework
Understanding SSR in This Context
Silent Strategic Response (SSR) = a deliberate, non-reactive pause or minimalistic response used to:
Observe, collect information, and manage emotions before acting.
Avoid unnecessary escalation or noise in sensitive situations.
Signal gravitas, control, and high-value decision-making.
In organizational communication, SSR helps:
During conflict or high-pressure moments to prevent impulsive words/actions.
When stakeholder alignment is incomplete but public statements are expected.
To assess hidden signals (body language, data trends, stakeholder reactions) before finalizing the next step.
Step | Character / Label | Where SSR Fits | SSR Practice | Expected Added Value |
1 Foundation | Identify Needs | Before/after stakeholder mapping | Use quiet observation and note-taking instead of immediate responses in initial interviews | Deeper insights, less bias |
2 Extension | Address Psychological Needs | When feedback is sensitive | Allow silent reflection after receiving feedback before responding | Builds trust; shows respect |
3 Coding | Build Relatedness Skills | In digital collaboration conflicts | Pause replies in chat channels, review tone before posting | Reduces digital misinterpretation |
4 Document | Guide Task Completion | Before goal setting or delegating | Silent review of data dashboards before assigning tasks | Better prioritization |
5 Grammarly | Resolve Conflict | Key SSR stage – in mediation or negotiation pauses | Strategic silence after provocative statements; take notes | De-escalation, better reframing |
6 Decisive | Facilitate Decision Making | Before consensus call or voting | Silent pre-vote thinking or ‘quiet writing’ technique (Amazon-style) | Higher quality decisions |
7 Influence | Present & Persuade | After presenting key data | Pause for audience reactions; rhetorical silence to emphasize a point | Stronger impact, audience engagement |
8 Value | Communicate Earnings/Value | Before ROI announcement | Quietly review analytics; embargo until clarity | Accuracy, credibility |
9 Manage | Integrate Participative Management | In co-creation workshops | ‘Silent brainstorming’ (everyone writes ideas before group talk) | Inclusion, reduces dominance bias |
10 Traditional Touch | Leverage MIS & Present Paper | Before formal presentations | Strategic silence after questions to allow reflection; preview slides quietly before launch | Poise, perceived authority |
Placement in Clusters
Cluster | SSR Function |
Foundation (1–2) | Listening & non-reactivity to build trust. |
Execution (3–4) | Silent data review to ensure clarity before action. |
Decision & Resolution (5–6) | Pauses for de-escalation and thoughtful decision-making. |
Influence & Value (7–8) | Use rhetorical silence for impact; quiet data verification. |
Management & Strategic Positioning (9–10) | Silent brainstorming, pause before strategic statements. |
Revised Outcome Statement
“By embedding Silent Strategic Response (SSR) at critical junctures of the 10-step framework, organizations gain a structured pause mechanism that enhances psychological safety, de-escalates conflict, improves decision quality, strengthens persuasion, and elevates strategic credibility.”
decision-making, audience engagement, shared leadership, and strategic visibility.
uster | Steps & Characters | Focus / Essence | SSR Skill(s) |
Foundation | 1-2 (Foundation, Extension) | Awareness, trust, psychological safety | Mindfulness |
Execution | 3-4 (Coding, Document) | Collaboration, workflow management | Reflection |
Decision & Resolution | 5-6 (Grammarly, Decisive) | Conflict management, structured decisions | Composure |
Influence & Value | 7-8 (Influence, Value) | Persuasion, ROI demonstration | Gravitas / Deliberation |
Management & Strategic Positioning | 9-10 (Manage, Traditional Touch) | Leadership, participative management, MIS reporting | Deliberation / Gravitas |
Key:
Mindfulness – Listening & non-reactivity to build trust
Reflection – Silent review to ensure clarity before action
Composure – Pauses for de-escalation and thoughtful decision-making
Gravitas – Strategic, rhetorical silence for impact and authority
Deliberation – Thoughtful pause before strategic statements
9. Discussion
The synergistic framework aligns communication steps with organizational and motivational models to enhance real-world impact. It combines:
Psychological alignment (SCCM, HEGM, DRRM)
Cognitive evaluation and decision-making (CEMAM, DVMM)
Operational management and workflow clarity (SOMM, CEMAM)
Motivation and financial impact demonstration (CMFM, PIPM, DVMM)
This ensures a holistic, practical approach bridging theory and application.
Contribution to Literature
This paper contributes to the communication and organizational behaviour literature in five distinct ways:
Holistic Integration of Communication and Motivation Models
– While prior studies treat communication models (linear, interactive, transactional) and motivation frameworks separately, this paper integrates them into a single 10-step synergistic framework linking psychological safety, operational workflows, decision-making, influence, and value demonstration.
Character-Based Structuring of Communication Actions
– Existing frameworks tend to be process-driven. The present study introduces character/label-based steps (Foundation, Extension, Coding, etc.), making communication actions more relatable, trainable, and measurable across contexts.
Model Alignment Across Multiple Theoretical Domains
– By embedding internal models such as CMFM, DRRM, HEGM, SOMM, CEMAM, NAGM, PIPM, SCCM, and DVMM, the paper operationalizes motivational concepts within communication processes—bridging a notable gap between motivational theory and communication practice.
Introduction of Silent Strategic Response (SSR) as a Meta-Strategy
– This study is among the first to formally position SSR (strategic, deliberate pauses and minimal responses) as a cross-cutting technique within an organizational communication framework, showing how it enhances psychological safety, de-escalates conflict, and improves decision quality.
Practical Toolkit for Academic and Organizational Application
– By mapping each step to specific skills, digital tools, and expected outcomes, the framework moves beyond conceptual models to a usable guide for workshops, digital collaboration platforms, participative management, and strategic reporting.
Collectively, these contributions advance the literature from siloed theories toward an actionable, theory-anchored, and motivation-aligned communication framework, offering researchers and practitioners a new lens to study and improve organizational interaction.
10. Conclusion
The synergistic 10-step communication framework provides a unified, actionable methodology that:
Supports foundational awareness and trust.
Enhances operational efficiency and team cohesion.
Enables informed, value-aligned decisions.
Amplifies influence, impact, and stakeholder recognition.
Integrates participative management, MIS reporting, and professional positioning.
The framework is immediately applicable for academic research, organizational workshops, and strategic leadership development.
11. References
Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication.
Barnlund, D. C. (1970). A Transactional Model of Communication.
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams.
Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou.
Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1974). Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument.
Social Penetration Theory, Coordinated Management of Meaning.
Management Information Systems Theory, Participative Leadership Theory.
Your internal models: CMFM, DRRM, HEGM, SOMM, CEMAM, NAGM, PIPM, SCCM, DVMM.


Comments